Friday, May 17, 2019
Bridgeton Industries: Automotive Component and Fabrication Plant Essay
In 1985, Bridgeton Industries, a  major supplier to Big-Three domestic automobile manufacturers, is facing a competitive environment with advent of foreign contention and rising gasoline prices, leading to shrinking pool of  exertion contracts. Bridgeton reacts by closing ACF diesel  locomotive plant and hiring strategic consulting firm to classify their products on competitive position.Based on analysis, Bridgeton outsourced oil pans and damper exhaust (classified as Class 3) and introduced programs, such(prenominal) as  declineing time required to change dies, to  alter product, quality and productivity. However, despite of these measures, manifolds were  landgraded from Class II to Class III in 1990 model year budget. Now, Bridgeton faces the  contend to decide if manifolds be outsourced and, more importantly, what more to do (in terms of strategy) to keep the business?Bridgetons  placement  Cost System It comprises of materials, direct labor and overhead. Per Exhibit 2, during pe   riod 1987-90, the overhead rates have  change magnitude as shown below especially after outsourcing in 1988. With outsourcing, the overhead cost have not  reduce at same rate as labor cost, leading to  postgraduateer costs for the remaining products such as manifolds. Thereby, outsourcing manifolds shall lead to higher cost for the remaining products such as fuel tanks and doors and shall push them down to Class III. Revenue and Profit Outsourcing manifolds will reduce cost however, the  gross sales will be  trim even more, since Bridgetons highest revenue is from Manifolds, which account for 41% ($93,120/$226,542) of their total sales in 1990, leading to lower profit.Business Market With higher efficiency standards, demand for stainless steel manifolds such as those produced at ACF could be increased dramatically and so, probably, would their selling prices. This will lead higher revenue and profits from sales of manifolds (if not outsourced) assuming no significant increase in the    cost (material).Therefore, outsourcing Class III manifolds (per Consulting  starchys recommendation) shall not be advantage for the ACF plant. Clearly, reduction in plant production volume and high overhead cost has caused ACF plant to be less cost competitive.Recommendations Following are the recommendation to  expend ACF plant resources efficiently and thus, improve overhead rates for existing products  Increase technology capability, thereby, increasing production of existing products  Use Activity Based Costing (ABC) to actually analyze the individual cost incurred for these products and  opportunity for its reduction  Initiate reforms in manufacturing and admin process Sell un-used outdated machinery that are causing big  derogation and insurance cost  Promote cost-cutting but preserving quality  Set budgets and review them on a weekly,  periodical and yearly basis.Through this we can utilize overhead expenses more efficiently and allocate it amongst current products to be cos   t competitive and keep the pricing within reasonable limits, helping us to maintain our  gainfulness and market shares.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.